User Generated Content – The Life Blood of the Internet and an AntiThesis of the Traditional Copyright System…

The Internet has been accused by many people, typically most of them associated with the Motion Picture Industry of harbinging piracy, and scaling exponentially the quantum of localised DVD piracy. This perspective isn’t entirely false, the only trouble is that when one sees things from a holistic perspective, the Internet has actually broken the back of what the traditional copyright system stood for.

The traditional copyright system which involved 2-3 centuries ago was designed to be a motivational tool for artists and creators. Over a period of time, it became a very limited monopoly, allowing only few people into it. It limited opportunities for creators and made them dependent on the publishers or the producers. In many cases, the bulk of the revenue was earned by the publishing companies, and the artists only got a small percentage of the royalty. This argument is ‘fair enough’ to some extent, because the publisher bears the risk in case of financial loss. This issue concerns the producers and the artists, but the larger problem of this system was that since a huge amount of investment was needed, it limited the distribution of the created content.

The Internet was designed to be a distribution medium, and a great one at that, and was never intended by its creators to be the next big market place. It is this thing that has gone terribly against the traditional copyright content creators, and is the reason why monetization of copyrighted content seems to be such a pain point for the copyright industry, typically the Film Industry in India.

Today, things have changed. Tonnes of content are created by users, and flipped around the Internet. No one knows who created them, no one knows how many millions, they will reach. Understandably, the content dies a quick death. But no one charged any money to create content, no one paid any money for purchase or access of content, and no one charged anything for distribution, all done within the framework of Internet access, thus completing the cycle of what the copyright industry stood for.

The underlining point here, is ‘access-to-anyone’ to be a part of this new system, something that was not a part of the original Copyright system. The potential to earn money is definitely much much lower, although the potential to win yourself millions of hearts definitely is. The stars of the Internet may never be as big as Stars of the Silver screen, but content creators like TheViralFever, AllIndiaBackchod, Bloggers like Lavanya Mohan, Krish Ashok etc have all earned fan bases for themselves.

11226011_1246090502083736_7814168759362748992_n

As with film or primary material like news paper, cartoons, these user generated content hold historical evidence of user’s thought processes and their lifestyles, at a given point in time. Even if users may use Copyrighted content as a base for content derivation, most of it would definitely fall within the realm of ‘Fair Use’.

Without User generated content, Engines like Facebook, Blogger, Wikipedia, YouTube or Twitter would cease to exist. The amount of time spent by ordinary users accessing content on these popular portals, had they not been there, may have gone towards watching Top-Down,native copyrighted content like Films, whether legally or not.

We have also reached a critical point where we need to debate if User Generated Content is as valuable or equal to that of Traditional Copyrighted Content, today for the ordinary Indian citizen. If that be the case, shouldn’t the Industry be seeing this as a more dire threat rather than continuing to focus¬†and blame Piracy, when legitimate threats have already encircled it from the flanks, when one considers the ‘expendable-time’ factor?

Advertisements

Free Internet by Facebook.. Wow.. But Really.. has Net Neutrality gone for a Toss?

This was the questionnaire that i had posted to Facebook’s blog site. I am not very optimistic about a response, but if i do get one, i shall share it here.

“Hi, I am a researcher working on various aspects of the evolving Internet ecosystem. I am sure, that you would have come across this question several times, but, I would like a response from the aspect of Net Neutrality. Is Facebook really promoting and providing free Internet to millions, or is it simply promoting itself? The definition of the Internet, should clearly be, free and Fair access to any website, chosen by an individual, but Facebook clearly isn’t doing the same. It would have made sense if Facebook had indeed made the entire Internet free, or at subsidised costs, without any bias, with users having equal access to any service of their choice. But, that clearly doesn’t seem to be the case.

For instance, I use a competitor to Hungama for my music listening services, but if i switch to your so called ‘Internet.org”, i will have to pay for it. Then, how is this fair and how is this making the Internet available to millions, when the basic rules of Net neutrality have been thumped for a toss? I hope i do get a response.

Read the original Facebook post here., and look at this quote, from that post.

“Today, Facebook and Reliance Communications are making the internet¬†(few websites only, including Facebook, off course) available to millions of people in India through the launch of the Internet.org app and free basic services. This is the first time the Internet.org app will be available in the region.”

FB2

 

P.S : Having made a nice big rant, and although, I do not stand for it, I have long believed that Net Neutrality is not at all viable in the long term, atleast not in India. And this is just a classic example, possibly. And i think, the strongest villain in this debate is the Elephant in the Room, Video, who hardly features in such topics of ‘Net Neutrality’ discussion. This will call for a seperate post. Hope you like the post.